Surviving Progress?

18 08 2012

Surviving Progress – A HowTo?

last Wednesday we went to watch Surviving Progress, shown as part of the Possible Worlds Canadian Film Festival, at Dendy (Opera House).  it’s apparently based on a best-selling book A Short History Of Progress, by Ronald Wright.

Possible Worlds billed it “From the makers of The Corporation and executive producer Martin Scorsese comes an absorbing, multi-faceted documentary on evolution, progress and social change”, which immediately got my attention.  The Corporation is a documentary I credit with triggering (not causing) my 5+ year plunge into dysthymic depression after watching it in 2005.  However there is no such reference to The Corporation on Surviving Progress’s website, and from a cursory glance at at their respective producers, only Mark Achbar appears to be common among twelve key creators.

i’m happy to report i’m not drowning in my own blood this time!  unfortunately for Surviving Progress, that might not be a good sign.  The Corporation struck me light lightning, a true epiphany, albeit one in which my path (of the three likely) after seeing it was to become totally overwhelmed & motivationally impotent (the other two likely options being: sticking one’s head back in the sand, or doing something).  Surviving Progress gave me nothing new, taught me nothing I didn’t already know.

even the film’s name, Surviving Progress, is, being generous, enigmatic.  does it mean “this documentary will offer a path of hope, a parable on how to survive Progress”, or merely tread old ground and pessimistically ask “how can humanity survive progress?”.  perhaps i was naive (nice to know it can still happen!), but the former was my interpretation.  unfortunately there are few if any answers on offer in Surviving Progress.

The Corporation was comparatively epic, a roller-coaster that dive-bombed into and out of a selection of topics that left one with the sense that this documentary barely scratched the surface of the myriad issues that face us.  but it was also more than that.  there were rays of hope that shone out, people making a difference and prevailing against The Machine.  even its closing credits had a laundry list of organisations and websites of those who are trying to Do Something.

Surviving Progress had no message of hope, no heroes, no call to action.  and yet, despite it’s depressing lack of hope, it washed over me and barely left a mark.  what gives?

J & I both commented afterwards that the audience was full of lefty alternative types.  that might seem like the likely target audience for such a doco, but really it’s just preaching to the converted – and in Surviving Progress‘s case, doing so with little to contribute to those of us who are already ‘tuned in’ to ‘issues’ (at least some of them).  to a small degree i feel like a senseless consumer, sucked in by the heritage alluded in its promotion and 2 cinema tickets poorer.

i remember thinking after watching The Corporation “OMG!  more people need to see this!  Important people who normally wouldn’t intersect such media need to see this!  the Prime Minister needs to see this!”.  i know, so naive.  to be fair to Surviving Progress, whilst it’s not an uplifting documentary, perhaps it could still impact others who haven’t yet had the wool covering their eyes removed, and effect transformation.  but how do you reach such people?  one at a time, organically, slowly, doesn’t seem to be cutting it against the overwhelming power of The Machine.

and then i look at myself, and think “WTF am I doing about it?”


just another fucking hypocrite.


it’s not me, it’s you two.

13 07 2012

for the first time in my life i’m unemployed.

well, maybe not technically unemployed – i think the government would categorise me as “under-employed”, which looks better in their stats.

you’d better go get a triple venti with a pre-warmed mug for this one…

but before i start:  why am i writing all this?  “it’s just a former client, move on!”, some of you might say.  sure, they are, and i am.  but there’s also a tale i feel like telling, part history, part drama, part bitchfest, but above all about how my views of two people have changed so dramatically over the last year, not just during this recent Final Cut.  generally i choose to stay isolated from most of the internal machinations of my clients.  it took the collapse of REDgroup last year (and a loss of $4.2k) to spark my curiosity, starting with my ‘Seeing REDgroup’ posts over a year ago, and gathering more perspective from various people involved since then.  it’s been quite an eye-opener.  this post alone has been two months in the drafting.  so without further ado…

when i moved to Melbourne 12 years ago, i had some casual work lined up with my just-become-former Sydney employer, and another client, both for electronics design stuff.  it would be enough to get by until i worked out something more permanent in Melbourne.  however within a month of arriving, my best friend Tony invited me to his employer to meet and discuss helping them through some difficult times the company was encountering with their IT setup.  i spent a few months doing that, and figured that would be it.  small business IT was something i was apparently capable of, though until then i’d had no intention of becoming self-employed in it!

12 years later, last May, that client called to say that my services would no longer be required, thank you very much.  it was a big and mostly unexpected gut punch.  as they unfortunately still make up two thirds of my income, it’s also a major OH FUCK moment, and has indefinitely postponed our European trip planned for September this year (thankfully we hadn’t quite booked flights that probably would’ve been non-refundable).

i say mostly unexpected, because although i’d just spent the previous two months making a raft of proposals to revamp various aspects of their IT (which they described as “excellent”), things had then gone very quiet.  a date for the next conference call to discuss timeline & costs came and went without a phone call.  a couple of my emails to the MD had gone unanswered.  i proceeded with preliminary planning regardless.  i should have picked up the phone, but in retrospect my suspicion is that moves were already afoot to choose a new IT provider.

Darth Maul and his apprentice Jeronimo are the new part-owners, directors and top level hands-on managers of the business, snatching it from the jaws of Administration last year following the appalling collapse of REDgroup Retail.

some background:  Darth Maul brought the business’s retail concept to Australia in ’95, and then sold his interest in 2004.  After Maul’s departure, Jeronimo was co-GM alongside my friend Tony, however both moved out of those roles after a couple of years, though headed in entirely different directions.  Jeronimo moved up and up into the Angus & Robertson owner, and thence into the newly formed REDgroup Retail, encompassing Angus & Robertson, Borders, & Whitcoulls book retail giants, as well as this business, my “Client # 1”.

in fact Jeronimo’s rise was quite impressive, reaching the level of Managing Director through to late 2010, and encompassing other director roles including Group Commercial Director prior.  I’m guessing one of the primary concerns of “Group Commercial Director” is to come up with answers to questions like “How do we make more money?” and “What do we do about sagging book sales?” and “WTF are we gonna do about these damn eBook things?” (A&R and Borders didn’t get eBook/eReader religion until early 2010, by licensing the ready-made Kobo system).  As Darth Maul himself once stated in his weekly wisdom email missives, it takes a certain kind of person and skills to not just survive, but thrive in that environment.

Jeronimo resigned from REDgroup a month or three before it went into Administration in February 2011.

Darth Maul, as his pseudonym here might suggest, has somewhat of a reputation as a lion or bull when it comes to business.  nevertheless, I found him quite straight forward, pleasant and fair to deal with most of the time. however it was the staff who truly bore the brunt of Maul’s management style.  according to some reports, staff would be bullied, belittled or berated mercilessly, often in front of other staff to the point of tears, until they complied with Maul’s Way.  it was almost always the stick, rarely the carrot, whether he was right or wrong.  no one enjoys working for a bastard.  the offices of Client # 1 became a far nicer place to be after his departure in 2004, and again in 2006 when Jeronimo moved up in the world.  that’s not just my opinion.  and the business continued to be profitable without their hands-on management.

Darth Maul sends out a weekly email (also published on an associate’s website) to chosen disciples, containing a distillation of his business wisdom.  He paints himself as honest, straight forward, hard-nosed but humane, and always striving to operate with the highest of integrity.  he even does a bit of volunteer community work.  it’s impossible not to think highly of Darth Maul if one judges him purely through these emails.  one presumes that he also tries to inspire these qualities in those he mentors.

Tony died in 2007 in palpable, inconsolable fear that when he returned from his long vacation, Maul was rumoured to become involved in the business once again (and eventually did, at a distance at least).  in previous years i would often have to endure long sessions of Tony debriefing/destressing from the torment he felt in that business at Maul’s hands.  clearly it takes two to tango, and if you’re desperately unhappy in a job then you should leave, but alas he didn’t, and the stress he endured over six years consumed most of his day-to-day life, with ramifications way beyond just his work-life, even after a year or two of professional psychological help.  the difference in the perspective they held of each other, and the lack of genuine communication of grievances, is instructive – Tony died nursing major psychological wounds at the hands of Maul, whereas Maul actually demonstrated he was human in his heart-felt eulogy at Tony’s funeral / memorial service, oblivious to the fear and loathing Tony harboured for him in his last few years.  if Tony had his way, Maul wouldn’t have been allowed that opportunity to speak – we deliberated this in planning his memorial service, but felt it wasn’t our place to deny his request; after all, such events are largely for the benefit of those left behind rather than the deceased.

anyway, in mid-2011 Maul & Jeronimo ride in to save the day.  they discarded the GM that Jeronimo himself selected several years earlier who had continued to keep the business profitable and who’d worked hard to rescue the business from Administration.  at the same time the staff were denied any stake in the new business entity – they’d gone to considerable lengths and cost to arrange themselves as co-buyers of the business in an earlier failed attempt to buy the business out of Administration.  lovely.

it didn’t go unnoticed by some staff that they were now under the management of one of the key personalities at the highest levels of hands-on management to preside over REDgroup’s demise.  gone too a few months later was the IT Manager, who’d served the business as long as I had, and served it above & beyond the call of duty.  he received his Dear John phone call on his birthday while on extended and serious sick leave.  arguably the business didn’t need him any more, but if you take one look at the dysfunctionally over-worked stress-ball who already shared and was about to assume the remainder of his responsibilities for their ERP system, i’d re-think that decision.

at a Sunday lunch with most of the staff (minus Maul, Jeronimo, the Bitch Buyer, and the StressBall) a few months ago, i’d never seen their morale so low, despite their retail season just completed being entirely successful.  they were distressed by the treatment of the former GM and IT Manager, denied equity in the new business despite being ready to sign, and resented being micro-managed by REDgroup’s failed chief head-kicker.  micro-managing the staff of a business that was one of only two profitable entities in the entire REDgroup  was a major slap in the face – these were the people who made the business worth buying out of Administration in the first place.  Maul & Jeronimo weren’t the saviours they might wish to paint themselves, at least not in the sense that the business needed them specifically.  credit where credit is due for pulling together the deal that ultimately did bring the business out of Administration, but frankly anyone could have stepped up to buy the business, and it would’ve resumed being just as profitable.  being charitable, it smacks of the knee-jerk reaction of a guilty conscience not wanting to ever re-live the agony of a business in death throes, by “trying harder next time”.

perhaps sensing the low morale, or simply being reminded after a successful season that his old comrades weren’t stupid, this year Jeronimo embarked on an inspiring process of consultation, re-thinking and streamlining of the entire business’s processes, and I was included in that to the degree possible for an outside entity.

however the flip-side of all this warm fuzzy consultation were re-worked position descriptions and annual employment contracts.  i’m told that demands and responsibilities placed upon staff had never been higher, the conditions that defined “Success” higher, and only token if any pay rise (bear in mind there probably won’t have been any pay rises since at least Q2-2010, a year before entering Administration, now over 2 years ago.)

so it probably won’t come as a shock that the exodus continued, only lately it’s those choosing to jump, rather than those of us who were pushed.  the warehouse manager and the bitch buyer, both staff members since the late 90s, have given notice, preceded by the NZ manager in February.  just this week another staff member gave notice.  they won’t be the last.  so far, and including me, 10 staff (or long term consultants like myself) are now gone.  besides Maul & Jeronimo there’s only about six left.  that’s two thirds of the business’s Experience Bank gone in less than a year.  the success of this doggedly profitable business is now under serious threat as it enters its second year.

i’m hearing in my head Henry Rosenbloom’s words “bovver boy managers” and “brutalist regime” in relation to the tactics REDgroup used to postpone its death in its final years.  “condescending prick” is another term that’s been used to describe Jeronimo, by someone I know is able to get along professionally with almost anyone.

but lets not reserve all the booting for Jeronimo.  this business leases a second warehouse, which they’ve been intending to sub-let to “a friend of the business” (‘FotB’ henceforth).  an unexpectedly wise temporary staff member from this FotB inspected this second warehouse, and identified a potentially significant workplace health issue.  it’s probably also the case that when some staff members from FotB laid eyes on this proposed new home, said “bugger this, it’s a dump and we won’t work there!”.  either way, it was significant enough for the MD of FotB to wish to retract his Letter Of Intent to lease the warehouse/office.  in immediate response, Darth Maul – who’s been a close friend of the MD of FotB for probably close to two decades – threatened to sue if he didn’t proceed to sign a rental contract.  unless Maul slipped in some sticky clauses, both surely would have known a LoI wouldn’t have been legally enforcable, but bizarrely the MD of FotB decided it was better to keep a “friend” who was willing to sue him to enforce the LoI, and then split his own business into a separate warehouse and office, rather than stand up for himself, legally if necessary, and say goodbye to a total arsehole of a “friend”.

it would seem Jeronimo has learned all the worst lessons from his mentor Darth Maul, too few of the positive ones, and despite whatever part he had (or didn’t have, but would surely have observed & had to approve of) in REDgroup’s demise, continues not to realise that being a head-kicker and condescending prick is neither attractive nor guaranteed to be profitable.

it’s like they view Doing Business as a mathematical equation with a bunch of variables that can be tweaked, in order to achieve a maximum result, but without any consideration of how those variables are known to interact.  10 out of 16 staff/partners gone.  how’s that approach working out for you, guys?

anyway, back to me.

i don’t have any specific knowledge of what lead Maul & Jeronimo to make this decision, despite asking.  Jeronimo says it wasn’t an easy decision to make.  presumably he’s referring to the number of years i’ve served them and the common departed friend who brought us together originally.  so lets run through some obvious possibilities…

i doubt my distance from Melbourne really has much to do with it.  in the 3 instances in 6 months where on-site attendance was necessary, they received it from the organisation i’d arranged to provide it, and received it as promptly as it takes to drop everything and drive out to their outer backwater suburban location.

maybe it’s about business risk, or professional indemnity insurance, or IT staffing redundancy, and all that good stuff you theoretically get from a larger IT consultancy, or maybe they just see themselves as being in a league deserving of IT support from a larger organisation, rather than the perceived risk of what would happen if i were run over by the proverbial bus?  i say perceived, because i’ve been providing service to them for 12 years so i think i’ve demonstrated some solidity, reliability, and wise navigation through myriad IT issues, and the organisation i’d arranged to provide onsite support would easily be able to step in.

in response to Jeronimo’s curiously vague question (as part of the comprehensive review of the business & its processes, & answered in my proposal) “Who should provide IT support to us?”, i acknowledged the obvious vested interest I had in answering the question, and stated my ability and commitment to continue doing so for at least the next 2 years, and that i was looking to make a career adjustment after a coupe of years along with a relocation to the NSW Northern Rivers; which to me seemed suited to the minimum period of time he’d indicated after which they might wish to sell the business.  when I expressed my disappointment that they’d not discussed or negotiated on any of the issues that obviously lead to their decision, Jeronimo’s response was characteristically vague and self-contradictory:

“The decision we have made is based on our assessment of the challenges we face and how we think we are best served to deliver them. I did not take into account your “palm tree” , I long for the same thing and it was never an issue. I gave this long and considered thought and summed up your proposals which were excellent as well as the opportunities elsewhere. I did not see the need to re-engage as i had the information i needed to decide. We have no intention to sell the business but we’d like to be able to sell  if it came up and therefore want our infrastructure and support ready for that time.”

So, that my commitment is not rock solid beyond 2 years wasn’t a problem, but it was.  Ah huh…  This is from a person who would probably describe himself as a “straight shooter”.  i think that’s what politicians call a Non-Answer Answer.  obviously the real reason lies elsewhere.

btw, that email conversation was also CC’d to Darth Maul, who despite our long history together, has not said or written a single word to me on this matter – no “look, here’s how it is” or “mate, we love what you’ve done for the business for so long, but we just need to go in another direction”, or even “Anthony, we’ve had issues with XYZ and just don’t think you’re meeting our needs any more”.  nothing.

nothing, except for Maul’s next weekly wisdom email titled “Kill those sacred cows”.  ouch.

but if I know Maul & Jeronimo, it’ll almost certainly be about money – *everything* they do, or don’t do, comes back to money, and they’ll proudly claim that to be a virtue no matter what the circumstances.  one can’t help but be attracted to the “managed services” IT consultancies that have proliferated in the last several years, one of whom they’ve now chosen over me.  many of these larger consultancies offer unlimited support on a per-seat/computer rate per month, often on a long contract period.  that deal typically includes reactive support for when things go wrong, preventative maintenance, and automated monitoring of systems.

however it usually leaves out an entire category of IT support, which I call the “Giving a shit” category:

  • when a staff member joins an organisation, or simply moves to a new/different PC, there’s a bunch of guff that one must go through – all that ‘first fun’ crap setting up a new user profile that Windows and its apps typically throw at you.  my clients rarely have to face that, because I do it for them, because I learned long ago that it’s 50/50 whether “normal people” get totally freaked out when they see that unexpected barrage at the start – they usually forget they once had to go through it on their own home PC 3 years ago (or had their teenager do it for them).
  • it goes without saying that i pre-emptively take care of Windows & software updates, largely as part of sound security policy, and because staff too often don’t notice that so many software updates cunningly install unwanted crapware if you’re not paying attention.
  • when someone moves a computer to a new desk, I’m the one who comes along afterward and makes all the cables tidy.
  • when servers need updating and rebooting, i always wait until after hours, so as to minimise the impact on the client’s business.
  • when i notice something not quite right in the look or feel of anything i’m doing, it usually triggers a brief investigation or a mental note, in case it’s a symptom of some unrevealed or unreported problem.

when you’re working to a money-clock with calls from other clients mounting up, this level of service or vigilance is too easily ignored.  unlike previous management, Darth Maul & Jeronimo have decided that’s not worth paying for, whether they realise they were getting it or not.

maybe it’s because i don’t send invoices regularly enough?

maybe it’s because i’m not a rabid Collingwood supporter who likes to schmooze with my clients after hours?

maybe it’s because i didn’t pull any punches in my ‘Seeing REDgroup‘ blog posts?  ( which were necessarily based on publicly available information & personal observation – it’s not like any of the smartest minds in the room are talking )  i’ve no idea if Jeronimo ever read them, but Darth Maul probably did – i emailed him a link to my ‘The Future Of Calendars’ blog post which directly followed the ‘Seeing REDgroup’ 4-parter (asking for his thoughts, which he kindly provided, dismissing the whole idea of software calendars & seemed content with a business model that’s as sure to dwindle as the years roll on as books have already).  late last year he made at least a couple of half-joking references to me being a ‘anarchistic troublemaker’, or words to that effect, and the likely source of that opinion would surely be this blog.  in retrospect, when Maul “half-jokingly” refers to you as an anarchistic troublemaker, it seems you’re pretty much screwed, even if it doesn’t impact at all on the service you provide.

or maybe it was my quip to Jeronimo last year (before I was fully aware of his position in REDgroup!) about “men in suits 20km away proving to be a greater risk to the business than a gap in their data backup regime”.  oops ;)

the most disappointing thing is that despite asking for more tangible reasons for their decision, i’ll probably never know for sure, because they just didn’t have the balls to say so.

so what have i learned from all this?

clients / customers never last forever, and i knew from the get-go last October that having all my eggs in 2 baskets (clients) after leaving Melbourne was a risk, and I should’ve applied myself much more to that task.  one tantalising and substantial lead here in Sydney came up, then went dead, then resurrected itself but then died again just as suddenly, all of it being a big waste of time waiting for something to happen, before eventually moving on.

another reason i held myself back from diversifying my client base was that in all honestly i’d not seriously considered / recognised the possibility that they were looking elsewhere for IT support.  with 20/20 hindsight i ignored or discounted warning signs as to what was going on.  i assumed i’d get the work as i had for the previous 12 years, and that for the next 6-9 months i’d be busy to capacity implementing this once-in-5-years refresh of their IT infrastructure.  such are the decisions / risks of the self-employed.

put these two together, and in my own mind at least it seemed like a reasonable excuse for procrastination.  bugga.

although i helped out Maul with some trivial IT stuff in the year or two that followed his departure from the business in 2004, it didn’t lead to any recommendations / referrals (me ditching his numpty business partner-at-the-time for being such a PITA probably didn’t help).  at any rate it’s another reason not to care about burning this bridge here now.

i’d not seen these two characters in a larger context until I sat down and laid it all out here, and accumulated other first-hand accounts, and combined it with the exodus currently in progress.  in that light, i’m actually happy to have nothing more to do with them, because i no longer have any respect for either of them.  Jeronimo appears to be incapable of reflecting on his own actions to see what part he might have played in the staff exodus in progress in his new venture, nor on the demise of REDgroup (at least not evidenced by the way he’s conducting himself so far).  all his fingers point outwards.  and Darth Maul, well, there’s Darth Maul, and there’s the picture he paints of himself every week – about all i will say is there’s some overlap.

it’s also given me a kick up the arse to get my website & other social media presences up to scratch, with a matching business card, and above all, a renewed commitment to stoking some new fire into my self-employment / business.

i’ve always felt a little guilty that i’ve never had to lift a finger to acquire my clients, most of whom i’ve served for many years.  its also been an extremely rare event to lose a client – client “churn” is a foreign concept to me, and I can recall losing only two clients in 12 years.  alas, now i will have to become accustomed to “breakfast networking” and other self-promotion for which i’m not well suited!

in our day

17 06 2012

2011 05 01 1304258118

a friend just forwarded me this chain email:

Checking out at the store, the young cashier suggested to the older woman, that she should bring her own grocery bags because plastic bags weren’t good for the environment.
The woman apologized and explained, “We didn’t have this green thing back in my earlier days.”

The young clerk responded, “That’s our problem today. Your generation did not care enough to save our environment for future generations.”

She was right — our generation didn’t have the green thing in its day.

Back then, we returned milk bottles, soda bottles and beer bottles to the store. The store sent them back to the plant to be washed and sterilized and refilled, so it could use the same bottles over and over. So they really were recycled.

But we didn’t have the green thing back in our day.

Grocery stores bagged our groceries in brown paper bags, that we reused for numerous things, most memorable besides household garbage bags, was the use of brown paper bags as book covers for our schoolbooks. This was to ensure that public property, (the books provided for our use by the school) was not defaced by our scribblings. Then we were able to personalize our books on the brown paper bags.

But too bad we didn’t do the green thing back then.

We walked up stairs, because we didn’t have an escalator in every store and office building. We walked to the grocery store and didn’t climb into a 300-horsepower machine every time we had to go two blocks.

But she was right. We didn’t have the green thing in our day.

Back then, we washed the baby’s diapers because we didn’t have the throwaway kind. We dried clothes on a line, not in an energy-gobbling machine burning up 220 volts — wind and solar power really did dry our clothes back in our early days. Kids got hand-me-down clothes from their brothers or sisters, not always brand-new clothing.

But that young lady is right; we didn’t have the green thing back in our day.

Back then, we had one TV, or radio, in the house — not a TV in every room. And the TV had a small screen the size of a handkerchief (remember them?), not a screen the size of the state of Montana . In the kitchen, we blended and stirred by hand because we didn’t have electric machines to do everything for us. When we packaged a fragile item to send in the mail, we used wadded up old newspapers to cushion it, not Styrofoam or plastic bubble wrap. Back then, we didn’t fire up an engine and burn gasoline just to cut the lawn. We used a push mower that ran on human power. We exercised by working so we didn’t need to go to a health club to run on treadmills that operate on electricity.

But she’s right; we didn’t have the green thing back then.

We drank from a fountain when we were thirsty instead of using a cup or a plastic bottle every time we had a drink of water. We refilled writing pens with ink instead of buying a new pen, and we replaced the razor blades in a razor instead of throwing away the whole razor just because the blade got dull.

But we didn’t have the green thing back then.

Back then, people took the streetcar or a bus and kids rode their bikes to school or walked instead of turning their moms into a 24-hour taxi service. We had one electrical outlet in a room, not an entire bank of sockets to power a dozen appliances. And we didn’t need a computerized gadget to receive a signal beamed from satellites 23,000 miles out in space in order to find the nearest burger joint.

But isn’t it sad the current generation laments how wasteful we old folks were just because we didn’t have the green thing back then?

Please forward this on to another “older” person who needs a lesson in conservation from a smartass young person…

We don’t like being old in the first place, so it doesn’t take much to piss us off.

oh i just love the finger-pointing game!  can i play too?

by the logic in this grumpy old man’s missive, it wasn’t the fault of old people who “didn’t have the green thing back then”, but honestly, nor is it the fault of snotty-nosed brats coming into receipt of a ravaged, depleted, sick world full of the vestiges of thoughtless, selfish old people.  or is it?

maybe, just maybe, there’s enough blame to go ALL around, in retrospect, and in advance?
…to the older generation who didn’t just accept their lot in life so humbly and honourably as depicted below, but who also sought to make life ‘better’ and easier for their children, most of them in blissful ignorance of the impact it would have on the world and its finite capacity.
…to the current generation who continue to strive for an easier life and who perpetuate and expand the culture of consumption & disposable products despite the knowledge of its many and varied negative impacts and in continuing disregard for the future generations, bamboozled as we collectively are by media long ago bought out by powerful commercial vested interests who misrepresent fact, disproportionately highlight scientific debate, and cunningly swap the popular meanings of “believer” and “sceptic” in the sham climate “debate”.
…and to the future generation we inculcate with these same ideals, who will follow in our footsteps, laden with overinflated senses of entitlement that will crumble when the world finishes collapsing in an eco-heap (which started at least half a century ago), who will then be forced to make extremely difficult decisions about their future (the ones that we’ve failed to make thus far), and endure an environment, and a lifestyle quite different and measurably inferior to what they were promised, due to the selfish actions of those in past generations.  at the same time they’ll want to reject the wisdom of those damn fools from the older generations who fucked everything up and who’ll probably only ‘fess up after it’s too late to do anything about it.
maybe, just maybe, finger-pointing and blame isn’t helping.
“back in my day” – it’s a phrase used by old and not-so-old alike.  Gen-Y altered it a bit, “back in the day”, to make it sound a bit less grumpy-old-man-ish, but i even hear Gen-Xers using “back in my day”, as if their lives are entering twilight, a sense of impotence in their ability to effect change.  but what does “back in my day” really mean?  halcyon days sometimes, but usually that things were harder back then and that the younger generation have somehow got it easy – which they do in a material sense, but they absolutely don’t in a whole lot of other ways older people conveniently forget.  but i think there’s much more to it than that.
the older we get, the less we seem to care (as measured by our actions, as distinct from our words), the less we are willing to change our ways, and the less we are likely to put our foot down and say “enough is enough!”.  teenagers have their pre-programmed rebellious phase, part of the process of growing up and discovering the boundaries of society, until they finally accept the world around them to large extent and fall into line with the status quo.  the older we grow, the less we want to change the world.  there are exceptions, of course, but that’s what they are: the exceptions, the troublemakers, the misfits, the square pegs in round holes, the ones who actually change the world.
“back in my day” almost always refers to collective culture, even if it’s invoked with individual experience to illustrate a point.  but “back in my day” isn’t just brandished to mean “life was harder back then”, but often as a claim to virtuousness, or at least retrospective credit for past sacrifice as measured by today’s standards, that “we were so ‘good’ to have endured such hardships back then, the likes of which these younguns couldn’t imagine”.  it becomes an unspoken “back in my day, things were better, WE were better“.
i call bullshit.  i think it’s also how we whitewash the consequences of our decisions and chosen lifestyles, even if that choice is made from the narrow range society considers appropriate.
“back in my day, we were better”.  maybe, maybe not.  but how did we get to this point?  on the rare occasions such questions are asked, the response, the suggested causes, are often presented as external factors, collective cultural pressures, or maybe the actions of Others, rather than the choices of the individual.  we even blame corporations for our plight, forgetting that it was us and our forebears – by deed or inaction – who imbued corporations with power that often exceeds that of the individual, but without the conscience of one.  and as we get older we even believe it’s too late to change those rules by which we, as shareholders, demand those corporations operate, blind to our own conflict of interest.
we are all responsible for our past.  we are all responsible for now.  and we are all responsible for tomorrow.

Dear Dell, You Are Several Kinds Of Idiot

21 07 2011

An email I just sent to Dell:

Dear Dell,

You are several kinds of idiot.

You also appear to think I am an idiot too, which I suppose makes sense given your idiotic disposition.

When I recently asked to buy a caddy for a hard-drive I wished to add to my Dell T410 server, you refused, cowardly hiding behind a  non-technically based “policy” preventing sale of a caddy-only (an item costing around $40), stating they could only be bought with a hard-drive.  So you quoted me one of the more expensive possible SAS hard-drives to accompany my caddy, $590, even though YOU KNEW I didn’t need a HDD and you could have quoted on the cheapest possible SATA HDD.

When I questioned this idiotic requirement, you hide behind “it’s Dell policy”, but are totally unable to explain or justify the policy.  I requested a phone call to discuss this situation, but all I received was another email from a difference faceless name repeating the Dell policy propaganda.  Hiding behind inexplicable policy is the last recourse of a dishonest business model, in this case one based on coercion & exploit of potentially ignorant customers.

I have since sourced a suitable caddy from an eBay seller (brand new, sealed in a box, which suggests Dell caddies CAN be bought without extortion from somewhere), and installed the extra hard-drive (which was originally from another Dell server).

Your idiocy and greed means you now get NOTHING, instead of something, and you should all be ashamed of yourselves for supporting this policy.

Yours sincerely,
On behalf of [REDACTED].

cybernetic yogi

8 04 2011

now for something completely different.  this is a comment i just left on (and if he allows it to be published, i’ll be slightly surprised ;).  quote:

ok so i’m a bit late to the Lets-All-Realise-Everett-Bogue-Is-Suffering-From-Naivety-And-Megalomania Party. that’s fashionable, right?

i’ve been reading some minimalist stuff lately & it’s been impossible to avoid seeing Everett Bogue popping up everywhere.  so i read some of him too.  before too long, i couldn’t shake the impression that Everett Bogue is just another insufficiently read/educated GenYer who thinks he’s the first person to discover something, but had the nous to capitalise on it and get a bunch of Fellow Seekers to pay him to live The Good Life – for the time being at least.

congratulations Mr Bogue, you’re a the top of a tiny pyramid scheme.  you’ve successfully discovered the ‘secret’ of countless shonks before you.

my best friend spent a year traveling the world – minimalist style – in 1996, and maintain that low-possession-count lifestyle in two of Australia’s busiest & most capitalist/consumerist cities, until his untimely death a few years ago.  minimalism wasn’t anything new then, and it sure as frak isn’t anything new now, although for sure the lessons can be carried into the digital realm.

but inherent in that low-possession-count ethos was an underlying reliance on other people’s possessions typically via living in a room with other housemates WHO PROVIDED MOST OF THE FURNITURE. and fridge. and ice cube trays.  when we took a holiday in Byron Bay, who do you think brought the beach towels?!!

Everett brags about how little he owns on his site.  i couldn’t help but notice there’s no refrigerator.  or beanbag.  who supplies those?  i’m guessing someone else.  that’s not minimalism, that’s an externality of the likes that any economic rationalist would be very proud. ? no, fuck you, Mr Bogue.  i understood the core of (and resonated with) minimalism from one brief conversation with my best friend 15 years ago.  i didn’t need to (and thankfully now can’t) spend $17 on your ebook to tell me what can be gleaned – for free – from hundreds of honest, well-meaning people.

and us$47 for your Minimalist Business ebook? yer kidding right?  i haven’t bought an ebook for more than $15 from highly talented writers who had something NEW to say.  no surprise you ignored my tweet politely asking why Minimalist Business cost so much.  so much for Twitter being the best way to communicate with you.

as for this $25/month cybernetic yogi shit, omg, that’s where you really lost me. as above, just another GenY kid so far up his own fundamental orifice he can’t see that he’s stumbled on what’s already been discovered long ago.  the abundance of nonsense cyber-infused new-age terminology won’t work on those who’ve seen it all before.  Facebook out – Twitter in?  fuck me, you sound like a vacuous fashion queen of the most objectionable kind.

Everett Bogue IS what i consider convergence; or history repeating itself, depending on how generous you feel today.

p.s. contrary to you bragging about your google rank for ‘cybernetic yogi’ etc, this ( site and 4 others ripping you a new one, were the first 5 hits when i googled “cybernetic yogi”. i pray that when i click on Image search i’ll see a cartoon Yogibear who’s been altered by the Borg.



Seeing REDgroup – Part 4 – A Perfect Storm

8 03 2011

A Perfect Storm

The failure of REDgroup is ‘A Perfect Storm’ writ large.  They were saddled with major debt right form the start, have been financially squeezed from every corner, but more than anything else they’ve compounded their problems with a sequence of bad decisions made by “bovver-boy” managers installed at the expense of losing their inherited experienced staff, thinking that the book publishing and retailing industry would yield to corporate thug tactics, or that consumers would be the slightest bit interested in buying barbecues from Borders.  One could argue that PEP made a mistake even buying the beleaguered (Borders) chain in the first place.  Alas, 20-20 hindsight comes easily.

Books are a sacred miracle of human evolution, representing that quantum leap from storing information only in our heads to be re-told to our descendants in stories, song and teachings, to miraculous devices that are easily and cheaply copied with fidelity, allowing an author, perhaps dead millennia ago on another continent, to speak directly into our head.

But where we buy books (and many other things) from is anything but sacred – most of us don’t give a toss, we just want to pay a fair price, and if Amazon can sell & ship it to me for up to 50% less than Borders or A&R can, where do you think I’m going to go?  And if I can have a book without a single tree being felled… hello?!?

It was this ‘revolution’ in book publishing that was partly responsible for lifting of the veil of the Dark Ages, a fundamental shift in humanity’s course.  Why should a significant refinement in how books are made, delivered and read also not have a significant impact on society again now? It’s not like I have a vendetta against bricks-n-mortar book retailers, but we simply don’t need as many of them as we used to, and will continue to need less of them as more people buy online and switch to eBooks.  Blacksmiths and shoe repairers died out because we didn’t need them any more.  So too will many categories of brick-n-mortar retailers, and hopefully coal miners.  That’s unavoidable progress.

REDgroup isn’t the first retailer to face the 21st Century and fail.  It won’t be the last.  But relative to its book retailing peers, it fell *now* because it made a bunch of bad decisions by people who didn’t understand the subtle, respectable, low-profit-margin art of bookselling.

And I’ve learned a lesson in being dependant, albeit indirectly, on an Old Media business failing to meet the challenges of the 21st Century.

Seeing REDgroup – Part 3 – A Tale Of Two Brands

8 03 2011

A Tale Of Two Brands

Angus & Robertson have been around way over a century (albeit with a litany of former owners in its more recent decades), with a long and respected reputation for selling quality books in a demure manner by demure middle-aged ladies wearing sensible shoes in demurely designed book stores.  From cities to countless regional towns, they brought quality books to every corner of Australia, the Everyman’s bookseller.  They’re classic Old Media, and they sold just one product category, and – until the last several years – did it fairly well.

Borders, the hip young USA brand that Gen-X & younger oozed over in the 90s and early 00s for its multimedia retailing tour de force – not just a massive range of books, but music (pressing a few buttons to sample any CD on headphones was a revelation!), DVDs, glossy magazines & more, in large, plush, comfortable stores with its very own cafe, seemed to take the book retailing world by storm.  Clearly Borders was commoditised American economic imperialism propagating across the world like a virus, but unless you were wedded to your local indie bookstore and studying a double arts degree, visiting Borders was like a guilty pleasure, but without the guilt.

The only way these two could be less different would be to compare them to Woolworths or KMart, or an indie one-store bookshop up the proverbial street, whose rickety floor-to-ceiling shelves feel like they’re about to collapse in a plume of dusty old-school dignity.  But despite their obvious differences, two pillars – the oldest and the newest – of the Australian book retail world have suffered the same fate at the same time.  What on Earth went wrong?

When Borders entered Australia in the late-90s, the two were genuine competitors with unrelated owners, and quite different business models.  But for individual reasons, both came under the ownership of Pacific Equity Partners (PEP), who formed REDgroup Retail to hold them, alongside Whitcoulls in New Zealand (and other sundry non-book entities).  By this stage, the wheels were already wobbling.

My guess is these two very different businesses were originally seen as complementary; A&R serves the Everyman, and Borders served lattes to the hipsters.  Unfortunately the devil is in the detail.  Borders AU/NZ/Sing were already in serious debt when snapped up by PEP, and A&R were headed down the same path.  Not surprisingly, two negative cash flows do not make for a positive cash flow, and under this growing mountain of debt (now totalling some $130M !!!) some truly horrible things have been done to both brands in a desperate futile attempt to stem the flow of borrowed money.

There’s been a bookshelf of words written this past week about REDgroup entering voluntary administration & who’s to blame.  Some of them hold water, some of them are utter nonsense, and some I’m really not remotely qualified to comment on.  Fell free to tell me which ones I got wrong!

  • Much hoohar has erupted over the claim by REDgroup’s CEO that the parallel import restrictions were a significant contributor in REDgroup’s demise.  However, given that (a) many of their books were marked ABOVE the Australian RRP (ie. they can’t have been too concerned about discounted books from offshore retailers), and (b) REDgroup’s own submission to the Productivity Commission in 2009 recommended KEEPING the PIRS, this is all clearly bumkum smokescreening.  According to Henry Rosenbloom from Scribe Publishing, the US and UK don’t allow parallel imports either, and if Australia were to do so it would have severe implications for local publishers, authors and printers, to the benefit of their overseas counterparts.
  • That GST should be applied to offshore imports, or be exempted from certain domestic retail categories, to “level the playing field”. This one’s gotta be the ultimate scapegoat, and Gerry Harvey had his hat handed to him in the court of public opinion in January this year trying on this furphy.  Suggesting that some select few endangered species of the Australian retailer genus should be GST-exempt is mind-boggling.  AS IF the Australian Government is about to do away with a major component of its GST income – the GST targets the retail level!  Online retail – from both national and offshore retailers – has steadily grown in the last decade from obscurity to significance.  In 5-10 years when I can try on a digital pair of jeans on my digital avatar and check for proper fit & see what they’ll look like from a virtual mirror on my high-resolution monitor, or point my smartphone at the corner of the room to project an image of a new sofa to see if it’ll fit in my room, and click a button to have it delivered, clearly the scope of what can practically be bought online is only going to grow, so why on earth would the Government set a precedent for slitting its wrists & slowly bleeding to death?
  • That too much of Borders stock was inappropriate for Australian readers’ tastes.  Maybe.  As Patrick Carr says on, Borders “sacrificed profitability for market share. They poured huge money into extensive stockholdings. Their hope was that if they stocked everything, shoppers wouldn’t look elsewhere.”  Unfortunately that didn’t work out so well, and I’m guessing that’s behind a lot of the $130M about to be written off by banks, publishers, and other creditors (everyone except their owners, PEP).  Whilst it was a correctable problem, paying off the debt from that catastrophic error when it’s already a tough market obviously wasn’t possible.  But it doesn’t explain Angus & Robertson’s equal lock-step demise…
  • That the honourable centenarian Angus & Robertson have been disrespectfully relegated to bargain-bin & best-seller-pulp status, undermining the value of their time-honoured brand.  If you narrow your range to pulp, don’t be surprised when customers buy pulp for a fraction of the price from Woolworths or Amazon/  But how did that happen?  Perhaps extorting smaller local publishers for an additional $2.5k to $20k to stock their books might’ve had something to do with them deserting the once respected chain, leaving A&R without unique compelling product?
  • There’s just so much more entertainment available now, and so much more competition for our disposable dollar & attention.  Even a mere two decades ago we consumed media distributed by news papers and magazines, TV, movies, music (vinyl/CD), and that was about it.  Computer/video games were niche, and there was no (recognisable) Internet/WWW.  Nowadays we have a smorgasbord of tech to keep us entertained & distracted on a whim anywhere, and all of them are seriously challenging the old-school old-media business models of physically-distributed media with territorial copyright licensed to 3rd-party distributors, or highly regulated & gate-keepered traditional electronic media.  Whilst the pie has grown much larger along with our prosperity, the number of ways that entertainment pie is now sliced has exploded.  We are reading less books.
  • No one’s talking about this one, but it can’t have helped matters that REDgroup made the tragic mistake several years ago of being convinced that SAP would be a good thing for their business IT infrastructure.  Surely a swish new world-class enterprise management system would make things better, right?  Did no one at REDgroup do their homework and read about the litany of over-budget & over-time SAP implementations scattered across the world in the previous decade??  Books have been written and websites dedicated to documenting their spectacular failures.  As other smaller entities in REDgroup came to make major IT infrastructure decisions in recent years, SAP was given a wide berth, for fear of crippling their own business with a grossly expensive and agonisingly slow development cycle.  Aside from that, any IT department that has a two week waiting list to delegate an internet domain name for their own online ecommerce store (something that can be actioned in 5 minutes) has way bigger problems than being duped by blowhard SAP salesmen.
  • eBooks & eReaders are taking a share. Yes, but I suspect this one’s a trivial component dwarfed by the other factors, but no doubt it’ll grow into a major additional bite in the coming years.
  • Let me drop two dirty words in the book industry: self-publishing and eBooks.  Thy time approaches.